bmore1147 Posted June 6, 2020 Posted June 6, 2020 client is looking to do a QDIA reset/ACA reenrollment mid year- the plan currently uses EACA and it can't be amended to the new reset deferral percentage mid year - anyone every opt out of EACA mid year? is it a problem to drop the EACA protections mid year and use a standard ACA/auto escalation for a mid year reenrollment. plan is not safe harbor. Any help would be appreciated.
Luke Bailey Posted June 8, 2020 Posted June 8, 2020 bmore1147, although it does not seem as important as in the case of safe harbor or QACA, where an employer commitment to making contributions is involved, and although the EACA provisions are only going to apply to a participant for 90 days, so that you might think you could amend mid-year effective for anyone hired after the date of the amendment or for whom the 90-day period has terminated, I think the IRS would probably interpret the Code's use of "plan year" in Code sec. 414(w)(4)(A) and Treas. reg. 1.414(w)-1(b)(1) as requiring that you not change for the year. Maybe someone else will have different thoughts. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
bmore1147 Posted June 9, 2020 Author Posted June 9, 2020 Luke- Thanks for the response- this was certainly my concern as the language under EACA appear to prevent mid-year amendments- I sincerely appreciate the response- We will most likely conduct the QDIA reset in august and default % reenrollment 1/1 - was hoping to complete this in one singular action, but it appears this isn't possible. Thanks for the response
Luke Bailey Posted June 9, 2020 Posted June 9, 2020 14 hours ago, bmore1147 said: Luke- Thanks for the response- this was certainly my concern as the language under EACA appear to prevent mid-year amendments- I sincerely appreciate the response- We will most likely conduct the QDIA reset in august and default % reenrollment 1/1 - was hoping to complete this in one singular action, but it appears this isn't possible. Thanks for the response bmore1147, again, not clear. Just looks like a concern, but no certainty that actually a problem, at least from what I can see. Good luck. Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034
bmore1147 Posted June 9, 2020 Author Posted June 9, 2020 OK- appreciate the response, thanks for the insight
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now