Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Our client's document says deferral election applies to irregular pay.  However, they often issue very small second checks for some reason.  (like under $100); an issue arose when the payroll company withheld FIT on a small check and no 401k deferrals....they quoted the OHS (OFFICE of HUMAN SERVICES) that FIT withholding takes precedence.  Anybody seen it handled differently?  The plan was audited by a CPA firm and they took issue with no deferrals being calculated prior to FIT.   So an impasse.....  

Posted

I agree that taxes take precedence over deferrals.  The objection from the auditor is improperly stated - were deferrals not "calculated prior to FIT" or not withheld because there was nothing left or because they were overlooked?  In any event how big a fuss is the CPA firm making over it, and can('t) you just say "so what do you want to do about it?"  

Ed Snyder

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use