TPAnnie Posted March 2, 2021 Posted March 2, 2021 We're doing testing on a takeover plan and found an issue - comp is not being capped for match. So, for their match formula of 50% of 6% deferrals, someone deferring $26k with $500k comp got a match of $15k rather than $8550. (We're right, right? That the comp must be limited, regardless of whether they're matching per payroll or annually?) I believe the correction is to forfeit the excess match, do you agree? (Also, is there an actual term used for this excess match?) Which amount goes into the ACP test, $15k or $8550? Now, to further complicate, this has been going on since 2015. (Fwiw, the higher figures' testing has always passed all testing - other than whatever test would have caught the problem.) This is such a large payroll, it would cost way too much to retro-amend the doc for a larger match. What would be the appropriate correction path to follow here? I appreciate any advice or suggestions so much, thank you!
C. B. Zeller Posted March 2, 2021 Posted March 2, 2021 6 minutes ago, TPAnnie said: We're right, right? Yes. Limiting compensation is a qualification requirement under 401(a)(17). 6 minutes ago, TPAnnie said: I believe the correction is to forfeit the excess match, do you agree? Close, but yes. It is not technically a forfeiture. The correction under EPCRS is to move the excess amounts (plus earnings) to a suspense account. The suspense account must be used to fund future employer contributions (as opposed to a forfeiture account, which can be used to pay plan expenses). No further employer contributions may be made to the plan until the suspense account is exhausted. 8 minutes ago, TPAnnie said: Now, to further complicate, this has been going on since 2015. If the failure is insignificant, you can self-correct. If it is a significant failure, it would have to be corrected under VCP since it is past the 2-year window. Bill Presson, Luke Bailey and TPAnnie 3 Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co
TPAnnie Posted March 2, 2021 Author Posted March 2, 2021 Thank you so much for that feedback, C.B. Zeller, it was very helpful.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now