Benefits Vet Posted August 26, 2021 Posted August 26, 2021 Can a plan adopt an 11(g) amendment to fix a discriminatory definition of compensation? The plan excluded bonuses, and it does not contain a fail safe provision to automatically include bonuses when necessary to pass testing. TIA
Bird Posted August 27, 2021 Posted August 27, 2021 I don't think you need to amend the comp definition, if that's what you're asking. Just increase the contributions using an -11g amendment. Belgarath 1 Ed Snyder
Mike Preston Posted August 27, 2021 Posted August 27, 2021 Just because the compensation definition fails doesn't necessarily mean that there is a failure. Just do the test using a non-discriminatory definition of compensation and see if you pass. If you do there's nothing to do. If you don't then the 11g amendment looks good. Bill Presson 1
Benefits Vet Posted August 30, 2021 Author Posted August 30, 2021 On 8/27/2021 at 3:32 PM, Kevin C said: Is it a safe harbor plan? Yes. 3% QNEC
Kevin C Posted September 2, 2021 Posted September 2, 2021 Since the 3% SHNEC is required to use a 414(s) compliant compensation definition, it will need to be amended. An -11(g) amendment is treated as if it were adopted and effective as of the first day of the plan year [1.401(a)(4)-11(g)(1)], so it works if the amendment is adopted by the 15th day of the 10th month following the end of the plan year [(1.401(a)(4)-11(g)(3)(iv)]. If you have access to the IRS Q&A session handout from the 2012 ASPPA annual conference, this situation was question 39. Mike Preston 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now