Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Education Consultant

Pentegra
(Remote / Putnam Valley NY)

Pentegra logo

Plan Compliance Analyst (Administrator)

RPA
(Remote)

RPA logo

Retirement Plan Analyst/Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote / Beaumont TX)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Will Laws Compelling Independent Review of Health Insurer Treatment Decisions Survive Supreme Court?
Anthony J. Sebok, via FindLawLink to more items from this source
[Opinion]
Jan. 29, 2002

Excerpt: Before the Supreme Court, Moran argued that the independent review provision was in fact part of the contract between Rush and Moran, because Illinois is allowed to insist that insurance contracts contain certain minimum content. That is to say, Rush doesn't have to sell insurance contracts in Illinois, but if it does, it has to include things that Illinois requires in its insurance contracts. If there is a dispute about the enforcement of that contract, then ERISA controls.

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2022 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.