Featured Jobs
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Will Laws Compelling Independent Review of Health Insurer Treatment Decisions Survive Supreme Court?
Anthony J. Sebok via FindLaw
[Opinion] Jan. 29, 2002 Excerpt: Before the Supreme Court, Moran argued that the independent review provision was in fact part of the contract between Rush and Moran, because Illinois is allowed to insist that insurance contracts contain certain minimum content. That is to say, Rush doesn't have to sell insurance contracts in Illinois, but if it does, it has to include things that Illinois requires in its insurance contracts. If there is a dispute about the enforcement of that contract, then ERISA controls. MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |