Featured Jobs
Bates & Company
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Carpenter Morse Group
|
Nicholas Pension Consultants
|
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE
|
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc.
|
Retirement, LLC
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation
|
United 401(k) Plans, Inc.
|
Prime Pensions, Inc.
|
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc.
|
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra
|
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc.
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
 |    |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
| IRS Explains Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan Top-Heavy Exemption FIS Relius  Feb. 2, 2004 Excerpt: The ruling does not address the use of forfeitures as safe harbor contributions. However, if the plan uses forfeitures either to offset the employer's safe harbor nonelective contribution obligation or to offset the employer's safe harbor matching contribution obligation (or as a discretionary matching contribution that satisfies the ACP test safe harbor limitations), the plan still should qualify for the top-heavy exemption with respect to forfeitures. |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |
