Subscribe to Free Daily Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Experienced 401k Plan Administrator/Consultant

Farmer & Betts, Inc.
(Tacoma WA / Tualatin OR / Littleton CO)
Executive Director

Employers Council on Flexible Compensation (ECFC)
(Washington DC / Telecommute)
MEP Assistant Team Leader

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Houston TX / Dallas TX / Austin TX / Scottsdale AZ / Telecommute)
Employee Benefits (ERISA) Associate Attorney

Stinson LLP
(Kansas City MO / Minneapolis MN)
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator

RetireWell Administrators, Inc.
(Marlton NJ / Telecommute)
401(k) Plan Administrator
Southern Pension Services
(Tampa FL)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Get the BenefitsLink app LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Excerpt: As readers of this blog know, I have written that I believe that such Fair Share laws are preempted, but other prominent commentators and academics have put forward equally sound arguments why ERISA preemption should not apply to the Maryland law. Rather than reiterating the competing legal analyses here, I am re-posting my analysis (which includes the Maryland Attorney General's opposite conclusion), as well as a helpful overview of this issue on The ERISA Blog a month or so back.
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2019 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.