6/30/2006: Sereboff v. Mid-Atlantic Medical Services Health Plan Subrogation Case (SCOTUS blog, published by the law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP)

Originally published May 18, 2006. Excerpt: The Court's decision goes a long way towards reconciling a number of conflicting decisions ... [but] the factual context of the case is likely to continue to spawn disputes over the circumstances that permit recovery.... [such as] situations where a segregated investment account does not exist or where the participant does not continue to hold the money.