Featured Jobs
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
State Retirement Administrators Respond to Call for Use of Corporate Pension Accounting Assumptions (PDF)
National Association of State Retirement Administrators [NASRA] 
[Opinion] Feb. 20, 2007
"Recent news stories and opinion pieces have stated or implied that public pensions should be using a corporate pension accounting standard to measure actuarial funding levels. This line of thinking suggests that public pensions should use a risk-free investment return assumption rather than the investment return assumption used by most plans of between 7.5 percent and 8.5 percent. To acquaint readers with this argument and the responses, NASRA has compiled below ..."
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |