Excerpt: Now that I have had a chance to read in some detail the Supreme Court's decision in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, I am more convinced than ever that this case will go down as one of the more important ERISA remedies cases in recent memory; more important than merely its essential holding that, 'that although §502(a)(2) does not provide a remedy for individual injuries distinct from plan injuries, that provision does authorize recovery for fiduciary breaches that impair the value of plan assets in a participant's individual account.' Nevertheless, many additional issues that could have been decided were avoided or not addressed by the full court and still need to be considered in the future.  MORE >>