Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
The Law of Unintended Consequences As Applied to a Business Owner's Retirement Plan
The Retirement Plan Blog 
June 23, 2008 Excerpt: [A 1936 article has since been popularized as The Law of Unintended Consequences, as] in case of a business owner using the tax laws to exclude Non-Highly Compensated Employees (Non-HCEs) from his or her retirement plan if asset protection is a key objective. Why? Because a retirement plan covering only the business owner and/or the owner's spouse is not an ERISA plan, and does not qualify for anti-alienation protections under Title I of ERISA. MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |