Regional Vice President of Sales The Retirement Plan Company
|
Bates & Company, Inc.
|
AimPoint Pension
|
Loan & Distribution Specialist AimPoint Pension
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Compass
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Professor Zelinsky on ERISA 514(a) Preemption: the 9th Circuit Got It Wrong
Workplace Prof Blog [Guidance Overview] Apr. 30, 2009 Excerpt: Edward Zelinsky (Cardozo) has just posted on SSRN his essay (forthcoming State Tax Notes) Golden Gate III, ERISA Preemption, and the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance. Here's the abstract: An exploration of the most recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. City and County of San Francisco (Golden Gate III) indicates that ERISA Section 514(a) preempts the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance. Two premises guide this exploration of Golden Gate III. First, employers' ongoing payments to health care administrators, such as insurance companies, constitute employee benefit 'plans' for ERISA purposes. Second, employers' contributions are central features of their employee plans. |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |