Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Sixth Circuit Opines on ERISA 'Safe Harbor' Exemption
ERISA Fiduciary Guidebook Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
July 27, 2009
Excerpt: In general, in order to fall under this safe harbor (and fall out of ERISA), one of the requirements of the safe harbor is that no contributions be made by the employer, i.e. if the employer is making contributions to the plan, then it is an ERISA-covered plan. Thus, because many disability plans are funded either partially or fully by the employer, they are covered by ERISA. In the recent Sixth Circuit case of Helfman v. GE Group Life Assurance Company, et al., a participant had challenged the district court's decision that the plan was covered by ERISA because the participant sought to get out from under the ERISA banner of deference afforded the plan administrator's decision. The district court had ruled that the plan administrator had not abused its discretion and upheld the insurer's termination of the participant's benefits.

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).