Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

California Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Incentive Compensation (PDF)
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Nov. 12, 2009

4 pages. Excerpt: In a closely watched case involving the Smith Barney Capital Accumulation Plan, the California Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that state law does not prohibit an employer from forfeiting an employee's incentive compensation when the employee quits or is terminated for cause before the date that the compensation vests. Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc., No. S1611385, 2009 Cal. LEXIS 11056 (Nov. 2, 2009). But in dicta, the court suggested an exception to its ruling: If an employee is terminated without cause, then the employee still may be entitled to a pro rata share of the compensation at issue. The court did not elaborate on what would constitute 'cause' in this context, whether the reason for the termination would make a difference, or whether an express provision in the incentive-compensation plan would eliminate the potential exposure. It therefore is unclear how far this exception may go.  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).