Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Supreme Court Endorses Governing Standard for Mutual Fund Fees Cases Under Investment Company Act: An ERISA Perspective (PDF)
Morgan Lewis via Mondaq Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Apr. 23, 2010

5 pages. Excerpt: On March 30, in Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., No. 08-586, __ U.S. __, 2010 WL 1189560 (Mar. 30, 2010), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Second Circuit's analysis in Gartenberg v.Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F.2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982), as the standard by which the fees mutual funds pay to their investment advisers should be evaluated under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ICA). On March 31, Morgan Lewis's Investment Management Practice issued an analysis of the case from a fund management perspective, 'Supreme Court Affirms Gartenberg Standard in Unanimous Decision in Jones v. Harris Associates L.P.' This LawFlash focuses instead on the implications the Jones case may have under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).