Subscribe Now!
Free Daily News, Jobs, Webcasts, Discussions
Display and Distribute
Your Job Openings
ARPA Webcasts

Featured Jobs

Client Services Manager

Pinnacle, An NPPG Company
(Delray Beach FL)

401(k) Retirement Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Telecommute / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

401(k) Plan Administrator

Pension Investors Corp
(Telecommute / Hollywood FL)

Pension Investors Corp logo

Principal Legal Content Specialist - Benefits

Bloomberg Industry Group
(Telecommute / Arlington VA)

Bloomberg Industry Group logo

Senior Compliance Analyst

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings
(Telecommute / San Francisco CA / AZ / CO / FL / IL / KY / LA / MA / NC / NJ / NV / NY / OH / OR / RI / SC / TN / TX / WA)

Ubiquity Retirement + Savings logo

Defined Benefit Plan Administrator

Pension Investors Corp of Orlando Inc
(Telecommute / Altamonte Springs FL)

Pension Investors Corp of Orlando Inc logo

401(k) Retirement Plan Administrator

BDS Consulting Group
(Worcester MA)

Free Daily News and Jobs

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>

Supreme Court Endorses Governing Standard for Mutual Fund Fees Cases Under Investment Company Act: An ERISA Perspective (PDF)
Morgan Lewis via Mondaq Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Apr. 23, 2010
5 pages. Excerpt: On March 30, in Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., No. 08-586, __ U.S. __, 2010 WL 1189560 (Mar. 30, 2010), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Second Circuit's analysis in Gartenberg v.Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F.2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982), as the standard by which the fees mutual funds pay to their investment advisers should be evaluated under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ICA). On March 31, Morgan Lewis's Investment Management Practice issued an analysis of the case from a fund management perspective, 'Supreme Court Affirms Gartenberg Standard in Unanimous Decision in Jones v. Harris Associates L.P.' This LawFlash focuses instead on the implications the Jones case may have under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2021, Inc.