Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Compliance Officer

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds logo

Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Combo Plan Administrator

Pollard & Associates
(Remote)

Pollard & Associates logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote)

Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary

Pension Plan Specialists, PC
(Vancouver WA)

Pension Plan Specialists, PC logo

TPA Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
(Remote)

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS) logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping

T Bank N.A.
(Dallas TX)

T Bank N.A. logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Solutions Specialists
(Remote / Jacksonville FL / Hybrid)

Retirement Solutions Specialists logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
(Remote)

Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA) logo

RP-Client Service Associate

Greenline Wealth Management
(FL / Hybrid)

Greenline Wealth Management logo

Retirement Account Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Court Rules That Physician's Extra Pay Is Overtime, and Is Therefore Excluded in Determining Amount of His Disability Benefit
ERISA Lawyer Blog Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Aug. 16, 2010
Excerpt: The Court analyzed the case by reviewing ReliaStar's conclusion that the $80,000 pay was overtime. In reviewing this conclusion, the Court applied a deferential standard, giving only some weight to ReliaStar's conflict of interest (as both plan administrator and benefit payor) since the plaintiff was unable to say how the conflict adversely affected ReliaStar's conclusion.

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.