Featured Jobs
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
BPAS
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Why the Traditional Structure of Investment Policy Statements Won't Work for 401(k) Plan Sponsors
Fiduciary News; registration may be required
Mar. 20, 2012 "In outlining the traditional structure for [a written investment policy statement], the CFA Institute retains language from the era preceding the dominance of 401k plans in the institutional realm. While this structure certainly continues to work well for private individuals and single portfolio institutions like endowments, traditional defined benefit/defined contribution plans (i.e., pension and profit sharing plans) and, yes, even split-interest trusts with multiple beneficiaries, it represents an awkward construct for 401k plans." MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |