Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Sixth Circuit Upholds ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims Against Nonfiduciary Bank Holding 401(k) and Health Plan Assets
Justia.com Link to more items from this source
June 12, 2012

"[Tennessee's Uniform Fiduciary Act ('UFA')] shields depositary banks from liability arising from the actions of a fiduciary depositor, unless the bank acts with 'actual knowledge' of a breach or 'knowledge of such facts that its action ... amounts to bad faith.' Because ERISA provides a remedy against nonfiduciaries who knowingly participate in a fiduciary's violation of ERISA, see 29 U.S.C. Section 1132(a)(3), the district court found that ERISA preempted any allegations of 'knowing' or 'bad faith' conduct that escaped the UFA's bar. We agree." Editor's note: See also the strong dissenting opinion: "There is no ERISA purpose or policy served by withdrawing the protection of state laws of general application. What is the possible harm caused by the enforcement of state laws providing damages if a bank recklessly allows its depositors' money to be embezzled by a fiduciary?" [McLemore v. Regions Bank, Nos. 10-5480/5491, (6th Cir. June 8, 2012)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).