Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Federal District Court Finds Michigan Tax as Applied to Self-Insured Health Plan Claims Is Not Preempted by ERISA (PDF)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Link to more items from this source
Sept. 11, 2012
"The [Michigan Health Insurance Claims Assessment Act] imposes an assessment of 1% on the value of all claims paid by every carrier or third party administrator for medical services that are rendered in Michigan to a resident of Michigan.... As defined in the Act, the word 'carrier' includes, inter alia, certain 'group health plan sponsor[s].... [This Court] concludes that the Act does not have an impermissible 'connection with' an ERISA plan. Because the Court has already concluded that the Act does not impermissibly 'refer to' an ERISA plan, it does not 'relate to' ERISA under either prong of the preemption analysis and is therefore not preempted under [ERISA section] 514(a)." [Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc. v. Snyder, No. 11-15602 (E.D. Mich., Sept. 7, 2012)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).