Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Tax Consequences of Plan Disqualification for Highly Compensated Participants
BenefitsNotes by Leonard, Street and Deinard Link to more items from this source
Oct. 29, 2012

"The highly compensated participant argued that only the portion of the benefit that accrued during 2004, which was the only year for which the statute of limitations was still open, could be included in his income. The IRS argued that ... even though the benefits had accrued over a number of years,... the participant should be taxed on the entire vested benefit in the year the plan was disqualified. The court agreed with the IRS: Because the participant had never paid tax on any of the accrued benefit, the entire vested benefit was included in income in that year." [Yarish v. IRS, U.S. Tax Court No. 24096-08 (Oct. 4, 2012)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).