Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Tax Consequences of Plan Disqualification for Highly Compensated Participants
BenefitsNotes by Leonard, Street and Deinard
Oct. 29, 2012 "The highly compensated participant argued that only the portion of the benefit that accrued during 2004, which was the only year for which the statute of limitations was still open, could be included in his income. The IRS argued that ... even though the benefits had accrued over a number of years,... the participant should be taxed on the entire vested benefit in the year the plan was disqualified. The court agreed with the IRS: Because the participant had never paid tax on any of the accrued benefit, the entire vested benefit was included in income in that year." [Yarish v. IRS, U.S. Tax Court No. 24096-08 (Oct. 4, 2012)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |