Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

State Street Unsuccessful in Request for Supreme Court Review of 6th Circuit Decision in Stock Drop Case
Bloomberg BNA Link to more items from this source
Dec. 4, 2012
"The U.S. Supreme Court ... will not review the ... Sixth Circuit's decision on the extent to which Section 404(c) of the [ERISA] shields plan fiduciaries from claims of imprudent investment in employer stock ... In its petition for review, State Street [had] asked ... whether ERISA Section 404(c) provides fiduciaries of otherwise-qualified plans a defense to liability against an imprudent investment claim when the participant's control over the investment is the proximate cause for the loss. It [had] also asked the court to consider ... whether liability under ERISA Section 409(a) for a breach of fiduciary duty claim requires that the breach constitute the proximate cause of the loss." [State Street Bank and Trust Co. v. Pfeil, No. 12-256 (cert. denied 12/3/12)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).