Featured Jobs
|
Director of Regulatory Operations and Compliance PCS Retirement
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Independent Retirement
|
|
Daybright Financial
|
|
Experienced Employee Benefits Attorney Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
Relationship Manager – Defined Contributions Daybright Financial
|
|
Stones River Consulting
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Director, Strategic Accounts and Channel Development July Business Services
|
|
Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Heartland July Business Services
|
|
Internal Channel Sales Team Lead July Business Services
|
|
Regional Sales Director-Mid Atlantic July Business Services
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Long Time Separation Does Not Equal Divorce for Purposes of Beneficiary Designation
Leonard, Street and Deinard 
Mar. 13, 2013 "The participant designated his son as beneficiary in 2005, while he was separated, but not divorced, from his wife.... The participant died in 2011 survived by his estranged wife and his son.... The court noted that the participant's intention was clear: he wanted his 401(k) account to go to his son. However, because the participant was still legally married to his estranged wife, she was the one who was entitled to a survivor benefit under the terms of the plan." [Gallagher v. Gallagher, No. 12-400 2 TSH (D.C. Mass. Feb. 26, 2013)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |