Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
EPIC RPS
|
|
Retirement Combo Plan Administrator Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
|
|
Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
Defined Benefit Specialist II or III Nova 401(k) Associates
|
|
July Business Services
|
|
Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
|
|
Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
|
|
DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
|
|
The Pension Source
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Merkley Retirement Consultants
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Creditors Can Reach Benefits under Top Hat Plan, District Court Rules
Womble Carlyle 
Apr. 11, 2013
"After recognizing that the Plan was exempt from ERISA's anti-alienation provision mandate, the [federal district court in Maryland] went on to address whether the terms of the Plan controlled over Maryland's garnishment laws by virtue of ERISA's preemption section 514. In holding in favor of the creditor, the Court ... [ruled] that ERISA did not preempt state garnishment laws that simply provided a procedural device for enforcing a judgment. As to the Participant's argument that garnishment would violate the terms of the Plan, the Court held that the creditor's rights were not subject to the terms of the Plan[.]" [Sposato v. First Mariner Bank, 2013 WL 1308582 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2013)]
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |