Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Creditors Can Reach Benefits under Top Hat Plan, District Court Rules
Womble Carlyle Link to more items from this source
Apr. 11, 2013
"After recognizing that the Plan was exempt from ERISA's anti-alienation provision mandate, the [federal district court in Maryland] went on to address whether the terms of the Plan controlled over Maryland's garnishment laws by virtue of ERISA's preemption section 514. In holding in favor of the creditor, the Court ... [ruled] that ERISA did not preempt state garnishment laws that simply provided a procedural device for enforcing a judgment. As to the Participant's argument that garnishment would violate the terms of the Plan, the Court held that the creditor's rights were not subject to the terms of the Plan[.]" [Sposato v. First Mariner Bank, 2013 WL 1308582 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2013)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).