Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

General Release of 'Any and All Claims' Trumps ERISA Pension Claim
Seyfarth Shaw Link to more items from this source
June 4, 2013

"The Court drew a distinction between entitlement claims, which it said are subject to ERISA's anti-alienation provision, and contested claims, which it said fall outside the realm of the anti-alienation provision. The Court defined a pension entitlement as a claim 'for vested benefits to which a plaintiff is entitled under the terms of the pension plan itself;' whereas a contested claim is 'a claim for additional benefits to which [a plaintiff] is not entitled under the terms of the Plan itself.'" [Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension Plan, Case No. 11-3438, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10475 (7th Cir. May 23, 2013)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).