Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of Supreme Court Opinion Ruling DOMA Is Unconstitutional on Equal Protection Grounds (PDF)
Supreme Court of the United States Link to more items from this source
[Official Guidance]
June 26, 2013

5-4 decision; opinion written by Justice Kennedy; dissenting are Justices Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Thomas. Excerpt from the syllabus: "DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.... By history and tradition the definition and regulation of marriage has been treated as being with in the authority and realm of the separate States.... DOMA rejects this long-established precept. The State's decision to give this class of persons the right to marry conferred upon them a dignity and status of immense import. But the Federal Government uses the state-defined class for the opposite purpose -- to impose restrictions and disabilities." [U.S. v. Windsor, No. 12-307 (U.S. June 26, 2013)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).