Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of Seventh Circuit Case Allowing ERISA Claim for Benefits Against Wisconsin Health Insurers Over Chiropractic Coverage (PDF)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Link to more items from this source
July 29, 2013
The three-judge panel determined that ERISA did not preclude the bringing of suit under ERISA section 1132(a)(1)(B) by several employer-sponsored health plan participants directly against six health insurance companies rather than the employers, when the plans are "insurance-based" and the insurance companies "decided all eligibility questions and owes the benefits." The participant claimed the insurance policies illegally applied co-payment requirements to chiropractic care under Wisconsin law. The court examined the Wisconsin law and found the policies were in conformance, however, so the district court's denial of the claim was affirmed. A claim for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA was rejected as being inapplicable to the insurance companies. [Larson v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company, et al., No. 12-1256 (7th Cir. July 26, 2013)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).