Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Complete Versus Conflict Preemption In ERISA Cases
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP via DRI 
Jan. 17, 2014
"When a claimant sues in state court, however, removal to federal court should not be a forgone conclusion just because ERISA issues may be involved. Because only certain types of cases are subject to removal and because of rigid time and procedural requirements, an analysis of whether to remove a case involving ERISA issues must be prompt and informed. This article provides a reminder and summary of one key consideration -- complete versus conflict preemption."
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |