Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
'An ERISA Claim Walks Into a Bar ...' -- A Follow-up on Heimeshoff V. Hartford Life
Bloomberg BNA 
Jan. 30, 2014
"The Court further stated that even in the rare cases where internal review prevents participants from bringing ERISA 502(a)(1)(B) actions within the contractual period, 'courts can apply traditional doctrines that may nevertheless allow participants to proceed. If the administrator's conduct causes a participant to miss the deadline for judicial review, waiver or estoppel may prevent the administrator from invoking the limitations provision as a defense.' " [Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co., No. 12-729 (U.S. Dec. 16, 2013)]
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |