Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Compliance Officer

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping

T Bank N.A.
(Dallas TX)

T Bank N.A. logo

RP-Client Service Associate

Greenline Wealth Management
(FL / Hybrid)

Greenline Wealth Management logo

TPA Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
(Remote)

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS) logo

Retirement Account Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Solutions Specialists
(Remote / Jacksonville FL / Hybrid)

Retirement Solutions Specialists logo

Combo Plan Administrator

Pollard & Associates
(Remote)

Pollard & Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
(Remote)

Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA) logo

Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
(Remote)

Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc. logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Relief, Confusion for Section 4980H(a) 'Pay-or-Play' Transition Relief
Moulder Law Link to more items from this source
[Guidance Overview]
Feb. 20, 2014

"The unanswered question is whether an employer who fails the second and/or third condition of the 'Fewer than 100 Full-Time Employees' transition relief rule is subject to the original 4980H(a) penalty which only allows an employer to reduce its full-time employee amount by 30 not 80. This would be an extremely harsh rule as it would increase an employer's 4980H(a) penalty by $100,000. Maybe the government wanted to create this harsh penalty to prevent manipulation, but it is odd a similar penalty would not be enforced against an employer who still has 100 full-time employees (including FTEs)."

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.