Featured Jobs
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Relief, Confusion for Section 4980H(a) 'Pay-or-Play' Transition Relief
Moulder Law
[Guidance Overview] Feb. 20, 2014 "The unanswered question is whether an employer who fails the second and/or third condition of the 'Fewer than 100 Full-Time Employees' transition relief rule is subject to the original 4980H(a) penalty which only allows an employer to reduce its full-time employee amount by 30 not 80. This would be an extremely harsh rule as it would increase an employer's 4980H(a) penalty by $100,000. Maybe the government wanted to create this harsh penalty to prevent manipulation, but it is odd a similar penalty would not be enforced against an employer who still has 100 full-time employees (including FTEs)." MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |