Featured Jobs
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
'Substantial Risk of Forfeiture' Clarification Impacts Tax-Exempt and Governmental Employer Noncompete Arrangements
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
Apr. 30, 2014 "Until the IRS issues final regulations under Code Section 457(f), a non-compete, particularly if it is combined with this type of part-time consulting arrangement, could still be a valid tax-deferral mechanism. One caveat is that in order for a non-compete to impose a substantial risk of forfeiture that defers taxation, the facts and circumstances must show that (i) given the employee's age and employment opportunities, the non-compete imposes a legitimate burden, and (ii) the employer intends to enforce the non-compete." MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |