Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of Wyoming Federal District Court Opinion Denying ACA Contraceptive Mandate Injunction for Catholic Diocese and Related Organizations (PDF)
U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming Link to more items from this source
May 14, 2014
"[It] is not Plaintiffs' self-certification that authorizes or obligates the TPA to ensure the objectionable contraceptive coverage; it is the ACA that does so.... Completing and submitting the form to the TPA 'simply shifts the financial burden from [Plaintiffs] to the government.' ... Through the ACA's accommodation, Plaintiffs have the right to be exempted from participating in, providing, or paying for the costs associated with the objectionable contraceptive coverage based on their sincere religious beliefs, but they have no right to prevent a third party (who does not hold those same religious objections) from meeting the ACA's requirements." [Diocese of Cheyenne v. Sebelius, No. 14-CV-21-SWS (D. Wyo. May 13, 2014)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).