Featured Jobs
|
BPAS
|
|
Participant Services & Operations Coordinator Pentegra
|
|
Spectrum Pension Consultants (part of Daybright Financial)
|
|
Retirement Plan Administrator (Part-Time) Accelefund, Inc.
|
|
3(16) Retirement Plan & Customer Liaison Compass
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court to Review Rules Governing Vesting of Retiree Health Benefits under CBAs
Benefits Bryan Cave
May 20, 2014 "Application of the [UAW v. Yard-Man, Inc.] presumption to collective bargaining agreements has resulted in uncertainty for employers and retirees, inconsistent outcomes for collective bargaining agreements covering employees in different circuits, and forum-shopping by retirees seeking application of Sixth Circuit precedent. A Supreme Court opinion should resolve the uncertainty for employers and retirees alike and eliminate the jurisdictional gamesmanship that has long plagued these cases." [M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, No. 13-1010 (on appeal from 6th Cir., cert. granted May 5, 2014)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |