Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Omni Operator

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Census Coordinator

BPAS
(Utica NY / Hybrid)

BPAS logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
(Remote)

Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Supreme Court Shuts Down 'Moensch'-Kin Land -- Whither Employer Stock Drop Litigation?
ERISA Fiduciary Administrators LLC Link to more items from this source
July 23, 2014

"With thinly veiled, almost Kingsfield-like, sarcasm, Justice Breyer tossed the 'Moensch Presumption' into the dustbin of judicial history based on a review of the text of ERISA as it has existed since enactment in 1974. Unanimously telling the lower courts that followed Moensch that they had been improvidently granting motions to dismiss for up to 20 years, while they marched up a yellow brick road to 'presumptive prudence,' because they didn't read the statute with sufficient care, is about as shrill as the Court gets in admonishing them about mushy thinking." [Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, No. 12-751 (U.S. June 25, 2014)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).