Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Pollard & Associates
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Regional Sales Director (West) July Business Services
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
July Business Services
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
July Business Services
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Sending FMLA Notices to Employees by U.S. Mail May Not Cut It Anymore
FMLA Insights Aug. 7, 2014 "According to the court, if the College could show that Lisa actually received its FMLA correspondence, her FMLA claims would fail. The court then analyzed the strength of different forms of notice. Certified mail, for example, offers a 'strong presumption' of receipt by the addressee. Regular mail, however, assures only a 'weaker presumption.' The court determined that this 'weaker' presumption is nullified whenever the addressee's denies receipt of the mailing. Think about that: a letter is not considered delivered by regular U.S. Mail whenever the addressee proclaims he or she did not receive it. And here, Lisa's denial allowed her the opportunity to submit her FMLA claims to a jury." [Lupyan v. Corinthian Colleges Inc., No. 13-1843 (3rd Cir. Aug. 5, 2014)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |