Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Distributions Processor - Qualified Retirement Plans

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC
(Remote / Wexford PA)

Anchor 3(16) Fiduciary Solutions, LLC logo

Retirement Combo Plan Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Plan Administrator

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC
(Remote)

DWC ERISA Consultants LLC logo

Plan Installation Manager

July Business Services
(Remote / Waco TX)

July Business Services logo

Regional Sales Consultant

The Pension Source
(AL / AR / GA / KY / MS / TN / TX)

The Pension Source logo

Implementation Specialist

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC RPS
(Remote / Norwich NY)

EPIC RPS logo

Defined Benefit Specialist II or III

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Senior Plan Administrator

Merkley Retirement Consultants
(Remote)

Merkley Retirement Consultants logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of Federal District Court Opinion: Plan Administrator's Rounding of Interest Rate Used for Cash Balance Plan Calculations Was Not Abuse of Discretion (PDF)
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Link to more items from this source
Sept. 30, 2014
"[R]ounding random numbers will produce half the number set rounding up and half rounding down.... [G]enerally, rounding is more fair than truncating. If the Plan Administrator had decided to truncate the decimal after five digits it would have the practical effect of always rounding the Monthly Interest Rate down. More fundamentally, the relevant ERISA analysis is one of administrator discretion, not whether 'the court itself would have reached a different conclusion.' ... The mere fact that the Plan Administrator made a discretionary decision that did not benefit Plaintiff does not, by itself, render that decision unreasonable." [Johnson v. Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan, No. 1:13CV156 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014)]

MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).