Featured Jobs
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Text of DC Court of Appeals Opinion Rejecting Challenge to Contraceptive Mandate Accommodation (PDF)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 
Nov. 17, 2014
86 pages. "All Plaintiffs must do to opt out is express what they believe and seek what they want via a letter or two-page form. That bit of paperwork is more straightforward and minimal than many that are staples of nonprofit organizations' compliance with law in the modern administrative state.... The accommodation requires as little as it can from the objectors while still serving the government's compelling interests. Because the regulatory opt-out mechanism is the least restrictive means to serve compelling governmental interests, it is fully consistent with Plaintiffs' rights under RFRA." [Priests for Life, et al. v. Burwell, Nos. 13-5368, 13-5371, 14-5021 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 14, 2014)]
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |