Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Plan Relationship Manager

ERISA Services, Inc.
(Remote)

ERISA Services, Inc. logo

Regional Sales Director (West)

July Business Services
(CA)

July Business Services logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Retirement Solutions Specialists
(Remote / Jacksonville FL / Hybrid)

Retirement Solutions Specialists logo

Client Service Manager

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

July Business Services
(Remote)

July Business Services logo

Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping

T Bank N.A.
(Dallas TX)

T Bank N.A. logo

Compliance Officer

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
(New York NY)

New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds logo

Retirement Account Manager

Fringe Benefit Group
(Remote / Austin TX)

Fringe Benefit Group logo

TPA Retirement Plan Consultant

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
(Remote)

EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS) logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Eighth Circuit: Choice-of-Law Provision Trumps Insurance Regulation Banning Discretionary Review
Lane Powell PC Link to more items from this source
Jan. 8, 2015
"[The employee] works in South Dakota ... [while the employer] is based in Minnesota and the long term disability policy was issued in Minnesota. The policy contained language requiring discretionary review, and the plan contained a choice-of-law provision requiring application of Minnesota law. South Dakota has banned discretionary review. Minnesota has no such regulation.... What standard of review applies: South Dakota law and de novo review, or Minnesota law and abuse of discretion review? [The Eighth Circuit] Court of Appeals held: Minnesota law and the abuse of discretion standard applies." [Brake v. Hutchinson Technology Inc. Group Disability Income Ins. Plan, No. 13-3421 (8th Cir. Dec. 29, 2014)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.