Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Associate Attorney Verrill |
Retirement Plan Administrator – Senior Associate PBMares |
Farmer & Betts, Inc. |
Retirement, LLC |
Kentucky Trust Company |
Retirement Plan Administrator (TPA) Retirement Plan Consultants |
Pentegra |
EPIC: TPA/DPS |
Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Associate Attorney Polsinelli PC |
EPIC Retirement Plan Services |
Plumbers Local Union No. 1 Benefit Funds |
Nicholas Pension Consultants |
Retirement, LLC |
Jr Retirement Plan Administrator/ Administrative Assistant Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc. |
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra |
Administrator/Consultant (DC and DB) TPA Professionals |
RTD Financial Advisors |
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc. |
Retirement Plan Documents Specialist Loren D. Stark Company |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
The Long-Awaited Death of Yard-Man Seyfarth Shaw LLP ![]() Jan. 27, 2015 "Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court and dismantled the Yard-Man presumption. In Yard-Man, the Sixth Circuit professed to apply traditional rules for contract interpretation in finding that retiree medical benefits ... had vested.... The Supreme Court found that the Yard-Man inference violates ordinary contract principles 'by placing a thumb on the scale in favor of vested retiree benefits in all collective bargaining agreements.' Instead, as in traditional contract interpretation, ascertaining the intention of the parties should be paramount." [M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, No. 13-1010 (U.S. Jan. 26, 2015)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |