Featured Jobs
|
3(16) Retirement Plan & Customer Liaison Compass
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Pension Investors Corporation
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
Federal District Court in California Asked to Determine Retroactive Applicability of United States v. Windsor
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Jan. 27, 2015 "The IRS has stated its position. In Notice 2014-19, the IRS stated that retirement plans are not required to recognize same-sex spouses prior to June 26, 2013, the date of the Windsor decision. However, the IRS permits employers to amend their plans to reflect the outcome of Windsor prior to June 26. In other words, employers can provide retroactive benefits, but they are not required to do so. It seems unlikely that the California district court, and perhaps ultimately the Supreme Court, would take a position different from the IRS. Nonetheless, employers should keep a close eye on the outcome of the decision. If the court finds that Windsor should be applied retroactively to employee benefits, it is possible that many other suits may be filed, and those suits may not be limited to surviving spouse benefits." MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |