Pollard & Associates
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
Fringe Benefit Group
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Defined Benefit Consultant/Enrolled Actuary Pension Plan Specialists, PC
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Oral Argument Analysis: Setting Up the Private Debate on the ACA
Lyle Denniston, via SCOTUSblog Mar. 4, 2015 "From the time that the Supreme Court agreed in November to hear the challenge to subsidies on the thirty-four insurance exchanges set up by the federal government instead of by the states, the Obama administration and its supporters have talked darkly about the collapse of the entire ACA if that challenge succeeded.... The uncertain thing, as the hearing approached, was whether that message would get through to the nine members of the Court who would be the deciders. If there was one dominant theme at the actual hearing, aside from how to read a complex federal statute, it was that a victory for the challengers would come at perhaps a serious loss -- perhaps a constitutional loss, but at least a human and social loss in the end of the most ambitious (and audacious) health care plan ever enacted in America." [King v. Burwell, No. 14-1158 (4th Cir. July 22, 2014; cert. pet. granted Nov. 7, 2014, argued Mar. 4, 2015)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |