Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Recordkeeper & Customer Service Specialist

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Remote / Commack NY / FL / Hybrid)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

Senior Defined Contribution Account Manager

Nova 401(k) Associates
(Remote)

Nova 401(k) Associates logo

Member Services Representative

DC Retirement Board
(Washington DC)

DC Retirement Board logo

Defined Benefit Consultant

AimPoint Group
(Remote)

AimPoint Group logo

Retirement Analyst

DC Retirement Board
(Washington DC)

DC Retirement Board logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Nicholas Pension Consultants
(Remote / Corona CA / Rancho Cordova CA / Hybrid)

Nicholas Pension Consultants logo

Benefits Production Manager

IUOE Local No. 478 Employee Benefit Funds
(Hamden CT)

IUOE Local No. 478 Employee Benefit Funds logo

DC Plan Administrator

Plan Design Consultants, Inc.
(Remote)

Plan Design Consultants, Inc. logo

Client Service Specialist

EPIC Retirement Plan Services
(Remote)

EPIC Retirement Plan Services logo

Defined Benefit/Defined Contribution Administrator

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc.
(Commack NY / Hybrid)

Heritage Pension Advisors, Inc. logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile App image LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook icon

<< Previous news item   |   Next news item >>



Sixth Circuit Church Plan Case Remanded for Settlement Consideration (PDF)
Bloomberg BNA Pension & Benefits Reporter, via Pension Rights CenterLink to more items from this source
Mar. 24, 2015

"The first church plan case to reach the federal appellate courts is being returned to the district court to consider a proposed settlement between the parties ... If the settlement is approved, this case will join the very first case in recent years to test the church plan exemption, Thorkelson v. Publ'g House of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am. ... as cases in which the district court ruled on the interpretation of the statute, but the parties settled before the court could rule." [Overall v. Ascension Health, No. 14-1735 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 2015)]

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).
© 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.