Compensation Strategies Group, Ltd.
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|ERISA Preemption and State Bans on Discretionary Clauses|
DeBofsky & Associates, PC
Sept. 18, 2015
"Following the promulgation of a model law by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners that bans the inclusion of so-called discretionary clauses in health and disability insurance policies, several states have issued laws or regulations adopting the NAIC's model law.... The reason discretionary clauses have been singled out for attention is because of a 1989 Supreme Court ruling, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch ... The Supreme Court held in Firestone that the typical judicial review standard applied in adjudicating ERISA cases is the de novo standard, which requires the court to independently adjudicate whether the benefit claimant is entitled to the benefits sought."
|Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above).|
|An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified).|