Nicholas Pension Consultants |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Prime Pensions, Inc. |
Trucker Huss, A Professional Corporation |
Retirement Plan Legal Specialist Pentegra |
United 401(k) Plans, Inc. |
Central Pension Fund of the IUOE |
Bates & Company |
Retirement Plan Relationship Manager ERISA Services, Inc. |
Pentegra |
Defined Benefit Calculation Specialist/Actuary The Angell Pension Group, Inc. |
Carpenter Morse Group |
Compass Retirement Consulting Group, Inc. |
Jr Retirement Plan Administrator/ Administrative Assistant Hochheiser Deutsch & Co, Inc. |
Retirement, LLC |
Nova 401(k) Associates |
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
| |
<< Previous news item | Next news item >>
What Osberg vs. Foot Locker Teaches About Equitable Remedies Under ERISA Stephen Rosenberg, The Wagner Law Group ![]() Oct. 15, 2015 "Enforcing equitable remedies under ERISA by focusing on whether the evidence supports the charge, as Osberg shows, is all that is necessary to separate the wheat from the chaff when participants come to court challenging plan decisions based on equitable remedies. So is Osberg a tipping point that may lead the way to a less grudging view by the courts of equitable relief claims under ERISA where allegedly misleading plan communications are at issue? Time will tell, but it has all the indicia that past tipping points in other areas of ERISA litigation, such as excessive fee disputes, have had: a well-reasoned decision by a well-respected court, well-founded in the evidence." [Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc., No. 07-cv-1358 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2015)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the link above). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® is providing a hypertext link to the item shown above, but is not the author of the item (unless otherwise specified). |