Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Text of DOL Advisory Opinion 2015-01A: Long-Term Disability Program Sponsored by the California Law Enforcement Association Is Not an 'Employee Welfare Benefit Plan'
Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL] Link to more items from this source
[Official Guidance]
Oct. 20, 2015

"[Y]ou have not shown that the individuals who participate in the CLEA LTD program are all employees of one such employer, i.e., the State of California. Instead, you suggest that the CLEA LTD program participants have a similar commonality to that shared by federal employees because they are covered by a state-mandated benefit package and participate in the CLEA program as a supplement to that state-mandated benefit package. However, even if state law entitles a diverse group of employees to specified benefits, that fact alone would be insufficient to satisfy the commonality requirement.... We do not view this commonality requirement as satisfied where the association's membership extends to individuals belonging to a variety of associations, unions or clubs."  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).