Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Temporary Document Specialist

BPAS
(Utica NY)

BPAS logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

What Does the Trust Requirement of ERISA Mean for Welfare Benefit Plans?
Stinson Link to more items from this source
Oct. 29, 2015

"A Ninth Circuit court of appeals case recently dealt with ... a multiple employer plan ... [that was] a long term disability plan funded by participant contributions deposited into a ... checking account to which the officers of the third party administrator were the signatories. The checking account was not a formal trust account and there was no formal trust agreement.... The court held that under federal common law, the third party administrator ... held the assets in trust for the plan beneficiaries. No formal trust document was necessary and there was no violation of the trust requirement.... The court also found that the third party administrator engaged in a prohibited transaction by paying itself fees from the plan assets even though the agreement with the sponsoring association authorized the third party administrator to pay its fees and expenses from the plan account." [Barboza v. Cal. Ass'n. of Prof. Firefighters, No. 11-15472 (9th Cir. Apr. 7, 2015)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).