Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

3(16) Retirement Plan & Customer Liaison

Compass
(Remote / Stratham NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance

The Pension Source
(Remote / Stuart FL / NY / TX / Hybrid)

The Pension Source logo

Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant

Retirement Plan Consultants
(Urbandale IA / Des Moines IA)

Retirement Plan Consultants logo

Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Data Administrator II

DWC - The 401(k) Experts
(Remote)

DWC - The 401(k) Experts logo

Retirement Relationship Manager

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Consultant

Sentinel Group
(Remote / Everett MA)

Sentinel Group logo

Plan Consultant - DB/CB

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Regional Vice President, Sales

MAP Retirement
(Remote)

MAP Retirement logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Pattison Pension
(Albuquerque NM / Hybrid)

Pattison Pension logo

DC Administrator

Pension Investors Corporation
(Remote / Altamonte Springs FL)

Pension Investors Corporation logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

Sixth Circuit: Fiduciaries in Stock-Drop Suits Should Be Evaluated on Real-Time Conduct, Not 20-20 Hindsight
Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP Link to more items from this source
Nov. 19, 2015

"[T]he Sixth Circuit held that an ESOP fiduciary's investment decisions satisfy the ERISA duty of prudence so long as the fiduciary uses a prudent process when the decisions are made. Further, a public company stock's current market price is deemed to be a reliable indicator of the stock's value, absent a showing of special circumstances by the plaintiffs as to why that price is not reliable. This is true even if in hindsight stock losses occur. This case represents good news for fiduciaries of plans that require investment in employer stock -- even though the days of a presumption of prudence are gone." [Pfeil v. State Street, No. 14-1491 (6th Cir. Nov. 10, 2015)]  MORE >>

Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title).
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above).