Fringe Benefit Group
|
Senior Specialist 401k Recordkeeping T Bank N.A.
|
July Business Services
|
July Business Services
|
Great Lakes Pension Associates, Inc.
|
TPA Retirement Plan Consultant EPIC RPS (TPA/DPS)
|
Defined Contributions Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
Retirement Planners and Administrators (RPA)
|
New York City District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
|
Pollard & Associates
|
Defined Contribution Account Manager Nova 401(k) Associates
|
Regional Sales Director (West) July Business Services
|
Greenline Wealth Management
|
Retirement Solutions Specialists
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
The Supreme Court Meant What It Said, and Said What It Meant: Dudenhoeffer Imposes Higher Pleading Standards
Benefits Bryan Cave Jan. 27, 2016 "In a rebuke to the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court granted the Amgen defendants' petition for certiorari, reversed the Ninth Circuit's judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion in the district court. The unanimous per curiam opinion was issued without further briefing and oral argument, an unusual step in civil cases. The substance of the opinion and its handling by summary disposition send a clear message: the Court meant what it said in Dudenhoeffer when it stressed the role of motions to dismiss in 'divid[ing] the plausible sheep from the meritless goats' and crafted new liability requirements that plaintiffs must plausibly allege are met in order to state a claim." [Amgen Inc. v. Harris, No. 15-278 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016; per curiam)] |
Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |