Featured Jobs
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
|
'Right-Sizing' Full-Time Employees to Reduce ACA Obligations May Lead to ERISA Class Action Exposure
McDermott Will & Emery
Feb. 17, 2016
"[W]hile the complaint includes claims for past and future health benefits and for 'incidental' lost wages, the opinion focuses on ERISA Section 510 and holds that the plaintiff has a viable claim that reducing her work hours was done for the purpose of interfering with her right to benefits under the company health plan. Second, the opinion finds that the complaint successfully alleged the employer's 'unlawful purpose' and intention to interfere with benefits, pointing to allegations that company representatives publicly stated that they were reducing the number of full-time employees to avoid ACA costs." [Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., No. 15-3608 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2016)]
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |