Featured Jobs
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
District Court Rules That Cross-Plan Offset Constitutes 'Grave Conflict of Interest'
AVYM Healthcare Revenue Consultants 
Mar. 22, 2017 "In an extraordinary decision, [a U.S. district judge] has effectively barred cross-plan offsets. The judge weighed in on two very important questions: ... whether UHC acted 'reasonably' in interpreting its client's plans to permit cross-plan offsetting; and whether the practice complies with the 'fiduciary duties imposed by ERISA'. The court offered an answer to both issues while providing very clear guidance for plans, claims administrators, medical providers and patients." [Peterson v. UnitedHealth Group Inc., No. 14-2101 (D. Minn. Mar. 14, 2017)] MORE >> |
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |