Featured Jobs
|
Sentinel Group
|
|
BPAS
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
|
Retirement Relationship Manager MAP Retirement
|
|
Pattison Pension
|
|
Strategic Retirement Plan Consultant Retirement Plan Consultants
|
|
DWC - The 401(k) Experts
|
|
Regional Vice President, Sales MAP Retirement
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Consultant/Actuarial Analyst Sentinel Group
|
|
Plan Administrator, Defined Benefit & Cash Balance The Pension Source
|
|
MAP Retirement
|
Free Newsletters
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
|
|
|
Seventh Circuit: No ADEA Violation When Rehired Retirees Were Terminated to Preserve Supplemental Health Insurance Coverage and Avoid Additional Costs
Ford & Harrison LLP 
Aug. 7, 2017
"The Seventh Circuit's decision ... aptly illustrates the difficulty plaintiffs encounter in ADEA cases with the 'but-for' standard of causation. [The case] also underscores the importance of employers not making or acting on 'stereotypical assumptions' about the capabilities of older employees based on their enrollment in Medicare or a Medicare supplemental insurance plan or pension eligibility or using age as the determining factor in employment decisions." [Carson v. Lake County, Indiana, No. 16-3665 (7th Cir. July 26, 2017)]
|
| Please click here to report this link if it is broken (for example, if you see a "404 File Not Found" error message after you click on the linked news item's title). |
| An important word about authorship: BenefitsLink® created this link to the news item, but we are not the news item's author (unless expressly shown above). |